ButAsForMe 

DEMOCRATS! WHERE’S THE WORK?

by admin on January 8, 2010 · 13 comments

in Democrats, Economy, Politics

After Attacking Bush During Periods Of Job Growth, And Pledging Their Stimulus Would Create Millions Of Jobs, Where’s The Dems’ Outrage?

LEADING DEMS ATTACKED BUSH WHEN
MILLIONS OF JOBS WERE BEING CREATED …

BUT, UNEMPLOYMENT IS TIED TO DEM CONTROL OF CONGRESS…
(After All, It’s Congress that Makes Law).

unemployment-rates-16-over

In 2003, Over 87,000 Jobs Were Created. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

  • But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) Criticized 2003 Job Creation As “Far From Enough.” “The slight increase in jobs last month is wonderful news for 57,000 Americans. But the 2.1 million Americans who have been actively looking for work for more than two years … know that it is far from enough …” (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, “Pelosi: ‘Slight Jobs Increase Far From Enough — We Must Do More to Create Jobs and Growth,’” Press Release, 10/3/03)

In 2004, Over 2 Million Jobs Were Created. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

  • But In 2004, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) Claimed Bush “Created A Climate … Where The Number of Jobs Is Not Growing.” “This President has created a climate in this country where the number of jobs is not growing. It did not have to be that way.” (Sen. Dick Durbin, Congressional Record, 10/08/04, p. S10764)

In 2005, Over 2.5 Million Jobs Were Created. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

  • But Pelosi Called 2005 Job Creation Numbers “Anemic.” “Today’s anemic jobs numbers confirm that President Bush has still failed to create a single new private-sector job since he became President.” (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, “Pelosi: ‘Today’s Anemic Jobs Numbers Confirm the Administration Has Failed to Create a Single New Private-Sector Job,’” Press Release, 6/3/05)

In 2006, Over 2.1 Million Jobs Were Created. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

  • But Pelosi Claimed Bush Policies “Favored The Privileged Few At The Expense Of America’s Working Families.” (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, “Democrats Will Restore the Economic Security of America’s Working Families,” Press Release, 9/22/06)

By 2007, 5.7 Million Jobs Had Been Created Under Bush. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

  • But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) Claimed Bush Had “Shameful History Of Losing American Jobs.” (Sen. Harry Reid, “Reid: As Unemployment Reaches Two-year High, American Jobs Are The Latest Casualty Of Bush’s Failed Economic Policies,” Press Release, 1/4/08)

THEN PROMISED THEIR $787 BILLION STIMULUS
WOULD CREATE MILLIONS OF JOBS

stimulus-jobs

In February, Obama Signed $787 Billion Stimulus Bill, Claiming It Would “Fix The Economy.” “President Obama on Tuesday signed the $787 billion stimulus package … ‘We have begun the essential work of keeping the American dream alive in our time,’ Obama said, calling the legislation ‘the beginning of the end’ of what needed to be done to fix the economy.”  (Michael A. Fletcher, “Obama Leaves D.C. To Sign Stimulus Bill,” The Washington Post, 2/18/09)

And Obama Pledged That Stimulus Would Create 3.5 Million Jobs By End Of 2010.“[W]hat makes this recovery plan so important is not just that it will create or save 3.5 million jobs over the next two years …” (President Barack Obama, Remarks At The Signing Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Act, Denver, CO, 2/17/09)

SO DEMS NEED TO CREATE 6.3 MILLION JOBS IN 2010 TO MEET THEIR OWN STANDARD, A LEVEL OF JOB GROWTH THAT HAS NEVER BEEN ACHIEVED

2.8 MILLION Jobs Lost Since Obama’s Signed His $787 Billion Stimulus In February 2009. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 12/10/09)

  • Including 85,000 More Jobs Lost Last Month. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/8/09)

In Addition To 3.5 MILLION Jobs Obama Promised Would Be Created By His $787 Billion Stimulus By December 2010. (President Barack Obama, Remarks At The Signing Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Act, Denver, CO, 2/17/09)

That Equals 6.3 MILLION Jobs Dems Need To Create This Year Alone To Declare Economic Success, A Level Of Job Growth That Has Never Been Achieved in American History. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

  • Because In 1946, 4.3 MILLION Jobs Were Created, Largest Job In A Single Calendar Year In American History. (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 1/6/10)

KNOWING AMERICANS WILL JUDGE THEM ON JOB CREATION, AT LEAST ONE DEM IS OUTRAGED OVER SQUANDERED 2009

Obama Says “The Yardstick Should Be … Am I Creating These Jobs?” (Sam Stein, “Obama: Judge Me On The Jobs I Create,” The Huffington Post, 12/15/08)

  • Pelosi: “Jobs, Jobs, Jobs … We Will Measure Our Success In That Way; And Hopefully The American People Will, Too, In The Next Election.” (Greg Sargent, “Pelosi: Judge Dems’ Success On Whether We Create ‘Jobs, Jobs, Jobs,’” “The Plum Line” Blog, 12/3/09)

DGA Chairman, Gov. Jack Markell (D-DE), Says “Burden Of Proof” On Dems To Show That They’re Creating Jobs. “When you’ve got as many people unemployed in the country as you do, it’s understandable that folks will be looking to their leaders to do everything possible to create jobs. As Democrats, there’s a burden of proof here.” (Peter Wallsten and Naftali Bendavid, “Departures Shake Democrats,” The Wall Street Journal, 1/7/09)

  • But Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) Says Obama Made A Mistake In Pushing Health Care, And Should Have Focused On Jobs. “I think it was a mistake to take health care on as opposed to continuing to spend the time on the economy… I would have preferred not to be dealing with health care in the midst of everything else, and I think working on the economy would have been a wiser move …” (Chris Zavadil, “Nelson: We Should Have Waited On Health Care,” The Fremont Tribune, 1/6/10)
  • And Obama’s Liberal Agenda Preventing Small Businesses From Creating Jobs, “Could Impede An Economic Recovery.” “But a health-care overhaul grinding through Congress could bring unknown new obligations to insure employees. Bush-era tax cuts are set to end next year, and their fate is unclear. Legislation aimed at tackling climate change might raise businesses’ energy costs. … Many companies say they have responded by freezing hiring, cutting benefits and delaying expansion plans. With at least 60% of job growth historically coming out of the small-business sector, according to the government’s Small Business Administration, that kind of inertia could impede an economic recovery.”  (Gary Fields, “Political Uncertainty Puts Freeze on Small Businesses,” The Wall Street Journal, 10/28/09)



POULAR POSTS:

{ 1 trackback }

Tweets that mention DEMOCRATS! WHERE’S THE WORK? — ButAsForMe -- Topsy.com
January 8, 2010 at 5:54 pm

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1 EightyDeuce January 8, 2010 at 7:35 am

You do understand that they inherited a bad job market, it just got worse as they took control. To bring someone in right at the point where something is breaking and then blame the problem on them and not the people in control during the time that it was collapsing is ignorant.

Reply

2 paulpo January 8, 2010 at 8:01 am

I’m sure you’ll agree that 9/11/01 was the Clinton administration’s fault.

Reply

3 EightyDeuce January 8, 2010 at 8:02 am

No, I blame Reagan… Read into it.

Reply

4 EightyDeuce January 8, 2010 at 10:13 am

Reagan referred to the Taliban as the “Freedom Fighters”, and also considered them to be no different than America’s Founding Fathers.
http://www.slate.com/id/2102243/
http://politicalinquirer.com/2007/12/31/ronald-reagan-meeting-with-talibanal-qaedamujahideen/

Reply

5 justaperson January 28, 2010 at 4:22 pm

Regan inherited one too. You didn’t see him blaming carter for it all the time. He fixed it! When am I going to hear the end of this childish “I didn’t do it” rant. Just fix it Obama. Lower taxes and don’t let government get involved in my life. We the people will pull out of this without government involvement

Reply

6 EightyDeuce January 8, 2010 at 7:44 am

The lost decade for the economy

The U.S. economy has expanded at a healthy clip for most of the last 70 years, but by a wide range of measures, it stagnated in the first decade of the new millennium. Job growth was essentially zero, as modest job creation from 2003 to 2007 wasn’t enough to make up for two recessions in the decade. Rises in the nation’s economic output, as measured by gross domestic product, was weak. And household net worth, when adjusted for inflation, fell as stock prices stagnated, home prices declined in the second half of the decade and consumer debt skyrocketed.

http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/3007/jobgrowth.jpg

Reply

7 Pepsi January 8, 2010 at 10:17 am

Even if your conclusions were accurate, Obama promised the stimulus would create jobs. And so far we have seen negative job growth. So much for his promises. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-and-Vice-President-at-Signing-of-the-American-Recovery-an/

Reply

8 EightyDeuce January 8, 2010 at 10:34 am

1) The chart is accurate
2) Apparently patience is a virtue that is lost on you and the American people. It’s funny how everyone expects instant gratification. To believe that you can turn around 30 years of bad policy in one years time is preposterous.

Reply

9 Jessi January 8, 2010 at 10:35 am

Actually, the labor market was doing very nicely under Bush once the Republicans regained the Senate and passed a supply side tax cut. Jobs were being created. The unemployment rate was declining. The civilian labor force was expanding. The civilian labor force participation rate was increasing. The employment-population ratio was growing as well. And we had record tax revenues.

Reply

10 EightyDeuce January 8, 2010 at 10:46 am

The fact is in the past 10 years standards of living have fallen, inequality has increased dramatically and the debt has risen from a few hundred billion to several trillion. The original George Bush was right: it’s voodoo economics to think that you can slash taxes without reining in spending and expect the economy to catapult ahead of that somehow.

Reply

11 Jessi January 8, 2010 at 11:21 am

GOP MOCKS DEMS: WHERE’S THE WORK?

Reply

12 codeslinger January 9, 2010 at 12:39 pm

Some simple economic truths:
* Raising taxes NEVER increases revenue except for the very short term. Lowering taxes usually increases economic activity and revenue overall.
* Income inequality is a meaningless concept – those who come by their wealth legally never do so at the expense of the poor. The quality of life for even the lowest earners is always better in a free-market society.
* The government can not create jobs (other than make-work), they can only limit the ability of the private sector.
* Socialism never works regardless of the number of times it has been tried.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: